Abstract guidelines


The deadline to submit your abstract is Monday 27 October, 23:59 (GMT)

We cannot accept late submissions or abstract and author amendments after this date, so please ensure that you have submitted and double checked your submission with plenty of time.

Abstract guidelines


The deadline to submit your abstract is Monday 27 October, 23:59 (GMT).

We cannot accept late submissions or abstract and author amendments after this date, so please ensure that you have submitted and double checked your submission with plenty of time.

Submission guidelines


What to consider before you submit an abstract

  • Abstracts that have been previously published or presented at a conference are welcome for submission.
  • Case reports/case studies/case series are permitted.
  • All abstracts must adhere to the following structure: aims, methods, results and conclusions.
  • You do not need to be a member of the RCS England to submit an abstract.
  • We encourage relevant submissions from all healthcare professionals: trainees, residents, consultant surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, operating department practitioners, allied health professionals, quality improvement staff and other interested hospital clinicians and staff.

Using the abstract submission system

Submitting an abstract is a multi-step process. Some questions are marked “required” and you will not be able to complete your submission until these questions have been answered. You will save your work as you proceed through the pages, however if you have to stop part way through the process your submission will not be saved or submitted and you will need to start the submission process again. After you have completed the submission, you can continue to amend your work until the submission deadline.

Amending a submission

If you wish to amend your submission you can do this at any time up to the deadline of Monday 27 October, 23:59 (GMT).

Submission agreement

  • Please do not submit multiple copies of the same abstract to different topics.
  • Each person may present only one poster. If you have multiple posters accepted, you must assign a co-author to present on your behalf.
  • Each selected poster must be presented by a named author, who must attend and be available to present the poster in-person throughout both days of the conference. There is no option to present your poster virtually.
  • We have a strict policy that the presenting author is required to purchase a two-day in-person ticket at the appropriate rate for that presenter according to their professional status on the first day of the event.
  • Failure to register by Monday, 23 March 2026, may result in your abstract being withdrawn from the conference programme.
  • Registration, travel and accommodation charges are the responsibility of the presenter.
  • Initially all correspondence will be sent to the submitting author. It is the responsibility of this person to pass on any relevant information regarding the submitted abstract and the conference to the presenting and co-authors. After the registration deadline, all correspondence will be sent to the presenting author.
  • Please note the conference organisers reserve the right to withdraw submissions at any stage, if they feel the content and/or organisation is no longer suitable.

Other information

You will receive an email confirmation that your submission has been received, indicating the abstract submission ID which it has been allocated. Please refer to this abstract number in all correspondence regarding the submission. Please note the email address that you supply in the submitter details page will be the email address used to correspond the results of your submission. If you change email addresses during this time, please let us know so we can update the system. Please check your junk / spam folders and contact rcseng.abstracts@wonderly.agency if you submit an abstract and do not receive confirmation that it has been received.


Queries

If you have any queries about the submission process or you want to withdraw your submission please contact us at rcseng.abstracts@wonderly.agency referencing your submission ID number. Please read the instructions below carefully before preparing your abstract:

  • Aim to capture the programme committee’s interest
  • Be clear and concise
  • Check the abstract carefully for spelling, grammar, readability and clarity


Abstract preparation and content


Q1 Submitter contact details

Please enter the contact details of the person submitting the abstract. Please note that all initial correspondence will be with the submitter of the abstract. This cannot be changed at a later date so please do ensure that the person submitting is able to remain as the main contact throughout the submission and acceptance process. Please note that the person submitting the abstract is the only one who can view and amend the abstract in the submission system.

Q2 Title

Your suggested title should be succinct yet clearly describe the abstract. Use sentence case (i.e. the first letter of the sentence is capitalised, with the rest being lowercase except for proper nouns and acronyms). Do not use any abbreviations in the title. The titles of accepted abstracts will be published in the final conference programme and on the conference app. (Maximum 160 characters)

Q3 Conflict and declaration of interest

Please declare any potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise that may influence, or could be perceived to influence the content of your abstract. This includes, but is not limited to, financial relationships, affiliations, sponsorships, or personal interests related to the subject matter of your submission.

Q4 Submission declaration

Please confirm your agreement to the following statement, in order for your abstract to be considered for presentation:

“I have read and agree to follow the relevant abstract submission guidelines and will take responsibility for managing my submission. This includes acknowledging the review outcome, registering the presenting author, and preparing the required material, either a physical poster or, if selected, a physical poster and accompanying short oral presentation. I understand that to accept the invitation to present at the event, one named author must register at the appropriate two-day ticket rate (based on their professional status on the first day of the event) to present the abstract. I also accept that it is my responsibility to ensure the presenting author is not presenting more than one poster at this event.”

Q5 Preferred presentation type

The submitter will be required to indicate the preferred presentation format when submitting an abstract. The two options are physical poster only or physical poster and oralpresentation. The final decision on allocations will be made by the programme committee.

Physical posters

All accepted abstracts will be presented as A0 physical posters, displayed in person at the conference in Birmingham on both days - Monday 20 April and Tuesday 21 April 2026. Posters will be displayed in the Exhibition Hall, where authors should be available to discuss their work during the breaks.

Oral presentation and physical poster

A small number of abstracts will also be selected for a short oral presentation, in addition to being displayed as physical posters. Oral presentations will take place in the Mini Theatres located within the Exhibition Hall, on either Monday 20 April or Tuesday 21 April 2026. If selected, presenters will be asked to prepare a short slide deck containing a maximum of two slides and deliver a 5-minute presentation (3 minutes to present, followed by 2 minutes for Q&A).

Please note that there is no option for oral presentation only.


Q6 Authors

Please enter the main author and any co-authors associated with this abstract. Co-authors are not mandatory, but please ensure you add all authors at the time of submission as it will not be possible to add authors at a later stage.

You will be required to enter the co-author’s details, so ensure you have these details ready:

  • Title, first name, last name, organisation, job title, email address.
  • You must ensure that you have gained the full consent of any co-authors and have made them aware prior to adding their details to the submission.
  • Please note you can list a maximum of 10 co-authors on your submission.

Q7 Abstract submission content

Your abstract should not exceed 350 words.There is an additional 150 word allowance for references.

General style guidelines

  • Use standard abbreviations only and place any unusual abbreviation in parentheses after the full word the first time it appears
  • Use generic names of drugs
  • If reference is made to proprietary products or equipment, the manufacturer's name and location should be included in parentheses
  • Please check your abstract carefully as it cannot be amended at a later date
  • Graphs, tables and images can be inserted. All images, symbols, tables, graphs and lines should be clear and distinct. Maximum file size 10MB
  • You may add one table and one graph to your submission. Graphs and tables are not included in the word count. Your submission should include a reference to the provided table and graph

The structure of your abstract

  • Each section of your abstract should provide essential information about your study, allowing readers to quickly understand its scope and significance.
  • We accept two types of abstracts: Research abstracts and case studies / case reports.
  • Because these have different purposes, they require different structures. Please follow the guidelines below according to your submission type.

Research abstracts should be structured under the headings:

  • Background: Clearly state the purpose of the abstract and why the topic is important
  • Methods: Describe your selection of observations or experimental subjects clearly
  • Results: Present your results in a logical sequence in text and simple tables - if results are not included, your abstract will not be considered
  • Conclusion: Clearly state the conclusion of your abstract

Case studies / case reports should be structured under the headings:

  • Background: Clearly state the purpose of the abstract and why the topic is important
  • Case presentation: Describe the patient in detail, including history and presenting symptoms, examination findings, investigations, diagnosis, treatment or intervention, and outcome
  • Discussion: Analyse the case in relation to existing literature, highlighting the significance of the findings, what makes it unique or relevant, and the key clinical considerations
  • Conclusion: Clearly state the conclusion of your abstract


Review criteria 


All abstracts will be reviewed ‘blind’. No identifying features such as names of authors, names of hospitals, medical schools, clinics or cities should be listed in the title or text of the abstract. Reviewers are asked to mark the abstracts on the basis of the judging criteria listed below. It is the responsibility of the person submitting the abstract to ensure that the abstract addresses the following criteria:

Section Guidance to submitters Scoring Scoring guidance - highest score Scoring guidance - lowest score
1.Title
(160 characters)
Give a title that succinctly conveys to your potential readers/ audience what your work is about. 1-3
2.Nature of work Choose the most appropriate dropdown from: Research (quantitative); Research (qualitative); Audit; Quality improvement; Other (describe). Not scored
3.Why did you do this work?
(up to 90 words)
Describe relevant background and context that led to the work. This could include description of a problem, current knowledge and specific aims. 1–3 The title and reason for the work is engaging and clear, and will be important and of interest to nearly all of the specialty group audience. The title and reason for the work is not engaging or clear, and will be of little importance or interest to the specialty group audience.
4.What did you do?
(up to 140 words)
Describe what you did, and the rationale for this. Include: any intervention(s), and how you assessed impact; nature of any data collected; approach to analysis of data. 1–3 Clear description of the work with highly appropriate rationale and approach for the issue or question being addressed. Unclear what was done; rationale and approach inappropriate for the issue or question being addressed.
5.What did you find?
(up to 160 words)
Summarise your key findings in relation to your aims, and according to the overall approach of your work (for example qualitative or quantitative research; audit; quality improvement; etc). 1–3 Clear and appropriate description of the key findings according to the overall approach of the work (for example qualitative or quantitative research; audit; quality improvement; etc). Unclear or insufficient description of the key findings according to the overall approach of the work (for example qualitative or quantitative research; audit; quality improvement; etc).
6.What does it mean?
(up to 80 words)
What can others learn from your work? How might it change understanding or practice? Discuss the meaning and actual or potential impact of your findings, including how generalisable. Consider commenting on strengths and limitations. 1–3 Potential learning is made clear. The work as described is very likely to change understanding and /or practice. (It is usually appropriate to give credit for a very large or significant study (eg national), but note that many types and sizes of work can have impact). Comments on strengths/limitations (if appropriate). Not clear what can be learnt. The work as described is unlikely to change understanding or practice. There is no comment on strengths and limitations (if appropriate).